Les
Néandertaliens de La Chaise by SILVANA CONDEMI (preface by Bernard
Vandermeersch)
Comité des Travaux Historiques et
Scientifiques. 2001. 178pp, 57 figures, 41 tables, 59 plates. ISBN 2-7355-0470-0.
(€38)
The Neanderthals occupy a unique place in the pantheon
of hominin species. Their apparent proximity to us in terms of appearance
and ability have held the world transfixed since the discovery of the
first fossils in the middle of the Nineteenth century. This fascination
with all things Neanderthal is reflected in the wealth of literature
that has been generated over the last 150 years. One could reasonably
say without fear of contradiction that the number of assorted pamphlets,
papers and books dealing with the subject far exceeds the total of Neanderthal
individuals that ever lived! It is therefore, always a distinct pleasure
to encounter a work on the Neanderthals that is dually able to contribute
to the subject and to raise the standard. Silvana Condemi’s monograph
on the La Chaise Neanderthals does just that. The principle aim of the
work is to present descriptions and interpretations of the La Chaise
fossil material; much of which has remained unpublished since excavation.
The importance of this material cannot be understated as it provides
crucial information on the evolution of the cranial and facial traits
of European hominins that predate the ‘classic’ Neanderthal
period.
The site of La Chaise is located on the shores of
the River Tardoire close to the town of La Chasie in Charente, France
(45° 66’ N, 0° 48’ E). The site consists of three
caves: Bourgeois-Delauny, Suard and Duport. First discovered in the
1850s and explored on and off until the first systematic excavations
took place in the 1930s. The caves were then intermittingly excavated
up until the late 1970s. Of particular importance is the Abri Bourgeois-Delauny
which contained the remains of 23 adult and infant fossils, with which
this work is principally concerned, dated to 151000±15000 BP.
Allowing for the maximum margin of error this places the fossils OIS
5e. This date puts the La Chaise material in a temporal context of extreme
importance in the Prehistory of Europe as its deposits cover a period,
just before the full Mousterian expansion of the last glaciation. The
fossil material is consists principally of a partial cranium, a mandible,
assorted fragments and teeth. Material from the Abri Suard, consisting
of 52 fragmentary adults and infants, are uncertainly dated to the same
time period and consist of a large portion of a cranial vault, an occipital
bone, an infant mandible and other fragments and associated teeth. Viewed
as a whole assemblage the material is interpreted as representing early
Homo neanderthalensis but preceding the later classic Neanderthal
phase of European occupation.
This work takes the form of a detailed morphological
description of the remains as well as an in depth metrical analysis
and attempts to place the material in a meaningful evolutionary context.
After the introduction the work is split into five main sections. Section
A: Cranial; which deals with the cranial material and is subdivided
into 4 sections that detail the calvaria of BD17A, 17B and ET BD4. The
Temporal bone of BD7, the sphenoid bone of BD7 and the occipital of
BD6. Section B: Cranial-Facial; analyses the zygomatic of BD23. Section
C: Mandibular; analyses the mandible of BD 1 and also lists the dental
material found from the various fossil individuals. Section D: Post-Crania:
describes the femur from BD5 and a fragmentary rib from BD3. Section
E: Conclusions; reviews the fossil assemblage as a whole and explores
its context within the European fossil record. Perhaps the greatest
strength of Condemi’s work lies in the well thought out and detailed
comparison between fossil material from other sites. This includes not
only earlier fossil material such as Arago, Mauer, Steinheim & Sima
dello Huesos but contemporary material from Saccopastore, Krapina, Gibraltar
and Ehringsdorf as well as later material from the classic Neanderthal
phase such as La Ferrassie, La Qiuna, Spy, La Chapelle-aux-Saints and
of course Feldhoffer. This allows the La Chaise fossils to be placed
within a meaningful evolutionary context. This in turn provides a greater
clarity with which to analyse the morphological traits of the fossil
material. Condemi points towards the Bourgeois-Delaunay material as
converging morphologically with the fossils characteristic of the ‘classical’
Neanderthal period although she does identify some differences that
echo the adaptations seen in earlier material. But also stresses that
point that without the presence of a clear stratigraphic chronology
it would have been problematic placing the La Chaise material in a clear
morphological context.
The organisation and structure of the work is exceptionally
straightforward and is worth commenting on. It deals with the fossil
remains in clear and concise sections each containing extremely detailed
morphological and metric descriptions of all of the remains from the
Bourgeois-Delaunay cave; as well as very useful and in-depth comparisons
with other fossil material. The illustrations and photos are of a very
high quality throughout and the tables of comparative data make this
an extremely important resource bringing together for the first time
in one place data that was previously scattered across a wide range
of sources. On the negative side the lack of any form of index is irksome
and can make locating specific material time consuming but that is a
minor point and should not be allowed to detract from the achievement
of this piece of work.
This is a work of exceptional detail and impressive
clarity. It deserves a comfortable berth on the shelves of any researcher
with even the slightest interest in the Neanderthals. In conclusion
I can do little better than to quote from Bernard Vandermeersch who
in the preface to this work wrote:
“…paléontologists ainsi que les
préhistoriens trouveront dans l'ouvrage de S. Condemi un document
indispensable à la compréhension des Néandertaliens
d'Europe.”
Simon Underdown
Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies
University of Cambridge
Review Submitted: March 2004
The views expressed in this review are not
necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews Editor.
|