Philosophy Guidelines for Marking of Course Essays and Examination Scripts
Alphabetical marks are for (i) non-assessed course work, (ii) provisional marks for assessed course work.
|Grade Mark Degree Class|
|A+||75 - 80||First|
|A||70 - 74||First|
|B+||65 - 69||2:1|
|B||60 - 64||2:1|
|C+||55 - 59||2:2|
|C||50 - 54||2:2|
|D||40 - 49||Third|
|Fail||39 and below|
First class (A = 70-74; A+ = 75-80)
Characteristics: exceptional thoroughness and clarity; exceptional insight or critical ability; originality; clarity and rigour of argument; extensive reading; demonstrated ability to formulate responses to questions in novel and relevant ways. Answers which address the question directly and proceed lucidly from one paragraph to the next throughout the essay. Answers need not be 'perfect': first class marks may be awarded either to work which, though not faultless, exhibits exceptional intellectual qualities (sophistication; originality; judiciousness), or, conversely, to work which, though not exhibiting any truly exceptional intellectual qualities, possesses virtues of composition and clarity to a markedly high degree. An A+ mark is reserved for work which shows an obviously superior understanding of the complexities of the issues involved and which the examiner considers distinctive in its excellence.
Upper Second (B = 60-64; B+ = 65-69)
Characteristics: well organised, clearly expressed; direct and relevant response to the question; evidence of good analytical skills, critical thinking and wider reading; effective grasp of concepts; relevant use of illustrative material. Answers which show a good command of the subject and use this knowledge to construct a soundly structured and argued piece of work, though which may also display some faults (missing certain aspects of the question, containing patches of weaker material, or holding back from giving voice to the writer's own views).
Lower Second (C = 50-54; C+ = 55-59)
Characteristics: shows a general understanding of the question; relevant but limited reading and use of examples; competent reproduction of ideas and concepts from lectures and textbooks with little evidence of independent, critical appraisal, or of wider reading; illustrative material of general relevance but not fully integrated with the text. Answers which show a sound knowledge of basic facts and arguments, but which present facts outside an analytical framework, fail to cover some key aspects of the topic, and/or make insufficient reference to the question.
Third (D = 40-49)
Characteristics: shows an understanding of the
question and the broader subject area, but little evidence of detailed
knowledge or reading; contains serious mistakes or misunderstandings,
unsupported assertion, and/or irrelevant material; failure to cover many
key aspects of the topic; poor organisation; poor expression; wholly
uncritical approach; unsupported assertion. Answers where there is some
grasp of the topic and some evidence of basic knowledge – of taking
notes and reading basic textbooks – but little beyond that.
Fail (F=39 and below)
Characteristics: fails to provide an answer to the question set; shows no more than a very general acquaintance with the field; absence, or near absence, of organisation; complete, or almost complete, lack of relevance; errors or incoherence revealing failure to absorb basic material taught on the course; consists only of notes making isolated points.
The department awards the following prizes to undergraduate students:
- Richard Murphy Memorial Prize (£150) for the best performance in the final year
- AJ Ayer Scholarship Fund (£100) for the best performance in the second year
- Seasonal Prize, Dawes Hicks Prize (two prizes) and AJ Ayer Prize (£30 each), for excellent performance in the first and second years.
In addition, we recommend outstanding students for the faculty medal (Rosa Morrison prize) and for inclusion in the Dean's List.
Please refer to moodle BA Philosophy handbook chapter 14 here.
Page last modified on 24 jul 13 15:37