Comment and opinion
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- Game of Thrones: why hasn’t Westeros had an industrial revolution?
- Green or white? Planted or painted roofs can cool buildings
- Drive to improve housing can bring unintended consequences
- Conservation should protect the most genetically unique species, not just the most rare
- Med City can galvanise science and business in the UK
- Recruiting university staff takes a lot of academic time
- If we want to save Ukraine, we need to call Vladimir Putin’s bluff
- Why is there still no World Environment Organisation?
- Legal avenues to fight climate change are limited, but growing
- What’s really behind George Osborne’s shiny new science ship?
- Five everyday myths that make it hard to understand pain
- No chance for peace in the Middle East
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
Call us: +44 (0)20 7679 9041
The UCL Media Relations team is the university’s central press office.
We connect journalists to expert academics and promote UCL research and teaching throughout the global media.
Legal avenues to fight climate change are limited, but growing
23 April 2014
Given that the IPCC now considers that climate change is “unequivocal”, that human influence is “95-100%” likely to be the dominant cause, and that its effects are already being felt around world, it is still surprisingly difficult to bring those responsible to justice. In terms of its ability to regulate the causes and mitigate the effects of climate change, politics alone is not working. Litigation through the courts is a powerful device that can be used to increase public awareness, pressure governments to implement and improve regulation, and ultimately to drive polluting industries and individuals to change, writes Professor Sharon Turner (UCL Laws) in The Conversation.