Comment and opinion
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- Game of Thrones: why hasn’t Westeros had an industrial revolution?
- Green or white? Planted or painted roofs can cool buildings
- Drive to improve housing can bring unintended consequences
- Conservation should protect the most genetically unique species, not just the most rare
- Med City can galvanise science and business in the UK
- Recruiting university staff takes a lot of academic time
- If we want to save Ukraine, we need to call Vladimir Putin’s bluff
- Why is there still no World Environment Organisation?
- Legal avenues to fight climate change are limited, but growing
- What’s really behind George Osborne’s shiny new science ship?
- Five everyday myths that make it hard to understand pain
- No chance for peace in the Middle East
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
Call us: +44 (0)20 7679 9041
The UCL Media Relations team is the university’s central press office.
We connect journalists to expert academics and promote UCL research and teaching throughout the global media.
Conservation should protect the most genetically unique species, not just the most rare
11 April 2014
A new approach has been pioneered by a collaboration of universities that could provide a method to decide how limited conservation funds should be spent. The technique uses genetics to ascertain how many relatives a bird species has, evolutionarily speaking, with the aim of identifying and prioritising species that demonstrate the most genetic uniqueness for conservation efforts, rather than simply those that are few in number, writes Dr David Redding (UCL Genetics, Evolution and Environment) in The Conversation.