NB Allow POPUPS from UCL - needed for several
functions (not advertisements!). If you get a warning, set 'always
allow' for popups from UCL. Your browser may
have further info under 'Tools'. Click
here for advice and inform cusplap@ucl.ac.uk with details if
anything doesn't work.
LAPT (London Agreed Protocol for Teaching)
uses Certainty-Based Marking (CBM - see below) in the presentation of
teaching material.
LAPT-pc is a
long-established Windows-PC
program for download and installation, mostly used by London students.
LAPT-lite
is this
browser version
- used on the web or with a CD. "-lite" because you can
take it anywhere, and use it with (almost) any browser - no
installation required. It was developed with a
HEFCE grant to encourage uptake of CBM.
It is freely available to all, and can be used with material hosted elsewhere.
Click here for : Publications,
presentations, discussions & webcasts based on CBM in LAPT
There is a
classic early literature review by Andrew Ahlgren
(1969), reconstructed here as a WORD document from fragmented web
files.
Suggestions,
comments: email cusplap@ucl.ac.uk or use the
Comment facility in an exercise.
Certainty-Based, or
Confidence-Based Marking (CBM)
What
is Certainty-Based Marking?
- After each answer, you indicate your degree
of certainty that your answer will be marked as correct.
- In LAPT, this is on a 3-point scale: 1 (low), 2 (mid) or 3 (high)
- We deliberately do not use words like 'sure' or 'very sure'
because these mean different things to different people
- The mark scheme and your assessment of the risk will guide your
choice of C level: see below.
Why
use
CBM?
- To make you think about how reliable your answer is
- To encourage you to try to understand the issues, not just to
react immediately to a question
- To encourage you to think laterally: other pieces of knowledge
may help to validate or question your answer
- To challenge you - if you won't risk losing marks if wrong, then
you don't really know the answer.
- If you are a careful thinker, but not very confident, you will
gain in confidence
- It is more fair - a thoughtful and confident correct answer
deserves more marks than a lucky hunch
- You need to pay attention if you make confident wrong answers -
to think, reflect and learn!
- Efficient study requires that you constantly question how your
ideas arise, and how reliable they are
How
does it work?
- Certainty levels 1, 2, 3 always give you marks 1, 2, or 3
when you are correct
- If you are wrong, then unless you opted for C=1 you will lose
marks: -2 at C=2 and -6 at C=3

When should I use the
different certainty levels?
- When you're sure, you obviously do best with C=3 . But you stand
to lose 6 (twice the gain), if you are actually wrong!
- If you are very unsure, you can avoid any risk of a penalty by
choosing C=1
- In between, you are best to use C=2: you stand to gain just
2 marks if correct, or lose 2 if you are wrong
- People are good at weighing up risks like this, but you will need
to think about whether you can justify your answer
- Look at the graph below, and you'll see how your average mark
depends on your choice of C level.
- suppose you think you only have a 50% chance of being right:
The highest graph for 50% on the bottom scale is black, for C=1. So you
will expect to boost your marks on average most by opting for low
certainty (C=1).
- if you think you can justify your answer well, with >80%
chance of being correct, then the red graph is highest, for C=3. Opt
for high certainty.
- Note that you are always best to be honest when indicating your
certainty: if you claim high certainty (C=3: red) when you don't
think it is justified, you will expect to do badly - with very likely a
negative mark on average. If you understand the topic well, and think
your answer is, say, 90% likely to be right, then you will lose out if
you opt for C=1 rather than C=3. You will do best if you can
distinguish which answers are reliable and which uncertain.
Why the name
change (12/05), from "Confidence-Based" to
"Certainty-Based Marking"?
The word "certainty" seems to carry much less baggage than "confidence".
The term "Confidence-based marking" has sometimes suggested to
people that confident personalities are being rewarded. This is not so.
Those who are rewarded are those who can distinguish between reliable
and unreliable answers. In the context of "How certain are you that
this is right?" or "How confident are you that this is right?",
they are equivalent. But "Certainty-Based Marking" is perhaps
less open to misinterpretation.
Further
Discussion: Publications
Problems,
queries,
suggestions: mail to cusplap@ucl.ac.uk Go to Top of Page