LAPT : www.ucl.ac.uk/LAPT
  UCL home of Certainty-Based Marking
UCL logo
Go to :   EXERCISE MENU,   LAPT Homepage,   LAPT-lite info,   LAPT-pc info ,   Publications,   ARGM/med,   Review
NB Allow POPUPS from UCL - needed for several functions (not advertisements!). If you get a warning, set 'always allow' for popups from UCL. Your browser may have further info under 'Tools'. Click here for advice and inform cusplap@ucl.ac.uk with details if anything doesn't work.
LAPT  (London Agreed Protocol for Teaching) uses Certainty-Based Marking (CBM - see below) in the presentation of teaching material.
LAPT-pc  is a long-established Windows-PC program for download and installation, mostly used by London students.
LAPT-lite   is this browser version - used on the web or with a CD. "-lite" because you can take it anywhere, and use it with (almost) any browser - no installation required. It was developed with a HEFCE grant to encourage uptake of CBM. It is freely available to all, and can be used with material hosted elsewhere.

Staff Information: Summary:  CBM: Teachers' and Students' Perspectives (includes exercise formats) Poster (pdf)
                                  Access to LAPT records : analysis, session records, comments, editing
Student Information (personal records):  UCL students , Imperial students
Click here for : Publications, presentations, discussions & webcasts based on CBM in LAPT
There is a classic early literature review by Andrew Ahlgren (1969), reconstructed here as a WORD document from fragmented web files.
Suggestions, comments:   email cusplap@ucl.ac.uk or use the Comment facility in an exercise.

Certainty-Based, or Confidence-Based Marking (CBM)
What is Certainty-Based Marking?

conf Why use CBM?  How does it work?

marks at each C level

When should I use the different certainty levels?

conf graph

Why the name change (12/05), from "Confidence-Based" to "Certainty-Based Marking"?
The word "certainty" seems to carry much less baggage than "confidence". The term "Confidence-based marking" has sometimes suggested to people that confident personalities are being rewarded. This is not so. Those who are rewarded are those who can distinguish between reliable and unreliable answers. In the context of "How certain are you that this is right?" or "How confident are you that this is right?", they are equivalent. But "Certainty-Based Marking" is perhaps less open to misinterpretation.


Further Discussion:   Publications            Problems, queries, suggestions:   mail to cusplap@ucl.ac.uk          Go to Top of  Page