"participant"	"UPI"	"presentationOrder"	"difficulty"	"gender"	"age"	"totalTime"	"feedback"
1	"1708095"	"1-9-5-4-6-13-14-12-8-15-16-2-7-3-10-11"	"7"	"2"	26	15.2395	"I looked at how it worked overtime and which one lit up last"
2	"3139885"	"1-11-16-5-12-6-3-2-4-10-9-15-8-14-13-7"	"3"	"2"	25	17.7714666666667	"The amount of times a certain pattern appeared influenced the distribution, and the timing of the events did as well because if A or B was activated first, even if by a few or less than 1 second, the letter that was activated first would precede the others."
3	"4076827"	"1-8-9-13-11-16-7-3-5-10-6-2-14-15-12-4"	"5"	"2"	25	16.8689333333333	"I just chose what I th ought was the probability of them being correct. I used timing as a way to think about how far the nodes could be away from each other"
4	"1254533"	"1-6-12-4-2-11-13-9-14-8-7-10-3-5-15-16"	"4"	"2"	26	18.7004166666667	"The timing of the events greatly influenced my choices. If they occured at the same time it means that they did not have a causal relationship."
5	"8229790"	"1-7-5-14-4-10-15-11-13-9-6-3-16-2-8-12"	"4"	"1"	30	20.6272166666667	"the order of when the nodes were activated. The timing was less of a concern- more just which was first, second, last, or at the same time."
6	"7638453"	"1-13-2-15-7-12-4-6-10-14-11-16-8-5-9-3"	"1"	"2"	27	22.23635	"Based off patterns and timing"
7	"1308580"	"1-14-8-15-7-2-5-10-3-12-9-13-6-4-16-11"	"7"	"2"	53	21.1229	"i tried to eliminate the unlikely, and after that i tried to choose an equal likelihood for what i thought were the possibilities.  timing was less important than precedence, except that one of the hypothetical priors occurred after the target event, which occurred once in the series"
8	"4212909"	"1-12-9-3-5-7-10-6-13-16-8-14-4-2-15-11"	"4"	"1"	28	22.72885	"The slower timing of the events meant that that time wasn't as efficient or successful. If it made the same sequence of events more than once, though, it meant it is more likely. "
9	"3875998"	"1-14-13-11-3-5-16-6-9-10-12-8-4-2-7-15"	"0"	"1"	45	22.6890166666667	"I tried to infer from the clip to the best of my ability what caused the events. Timing factored into my decesions as I assigned cause to things in a logical progression. "
10	"8231174"	"1-15-10-5-6-12-8-3-7-16-4-11-13-9-14-2"	"1"	"2"	27	24.7322666666667	"I distributed points towards how likely I thought the structure was correct. When multiple choices had the same chance to be correct I split the point difference evenly. The timing of events was very important as it allowed me to make choices based on whether events occurred seperately or together and base my decisions upon it."
11	"1085302"	"1-16-10-7-3-5-14-2-11-4-8-6-12-13-15-9"	"6"	"1"	24	21.2542	"I distributed based on the order the letters turned gray, and the time it took. If it happened quickly, I assumed it was because of one of the others, but for instance A charged E but it was a while before B turned gray, I guessed that B acted independently."
12	"6659191"	"1-13-4-10-2-15-14-9-11-6-3-5-16-7-12-8"	"4"	"1"	33	26.247	"Timing didn't influence my decision, only sequence. I mostly distrubuted them evenly unless one option seemed much more likely."
13	"5544532"	"1-9-4-11-12-8-14-6-3-10-7-15-13-2-16-5"	"3"	"1"	24	29.93665	"Timing didn't affect my decisions so much as simply the order. I based my eprcentage points around logic and a little bit of gut instinct since some were still ambiguous."
14	"535089"	"1-9-6-12-11-14-3-2-7-8-15-5-13-10-4-16"	"6"	"2"	35	30.5294166666667	"I distributed the points as evenly as possible when there were multiple possibilities but I did give preference to the last choice if A and B came on at the same time.I followed the rules that were given in the game in reference to the timing of the events.  Timing didn't really affect my decisions unless it was in reference to when E came on before  A or B."
15	"4133966"	"1-5-3-15-6-16-4-12-8-13-14-9-7-10-11-2"	"8"	"1"	53	20.9446166666667	" I tried to pay attention to the order in which they changed color. I must admit I was very unsure of what I was doing but I did my best to figure it out"
16	"8730254"	"1-3-13-15-9-4-6-16-11-5-7-8-12-2-10-14"	"4"	"2"	39	29.3641	"Yes"
17	"7236499"	"1-14-16-9-3-4-8-10-13-6-2-12-5-11-7-15"	"5"	"2"	38	31.0729166666667	"I distrubuted the percentage within rounding evenly across all structures that I thought were feasible given the evidence. I did not use the timing information beyond the basic ordering of the events."
18	"9420606"	"1-4-13-14-3-12-5-6-15-16-8-10-9-11-2-7"	"7"	"2"	55	37.3773833333333	"didn't consider timing so much as order (e.g., if A and B are simultaneous, one cannot cause the other; if A turns on before B, B cannot cause A)"
19	"2609005"	"1-8-6-7-11-2-3-9-15-16-12-10-5-13-14-4"	"1"	"2"	26	31.49495	"The timing didn't have much to do with my answers, more the order of events."
20	"6939499"	"1-7-5-3-16-9-8-10-11-12-15-13-6-2-4-14"	"0"	"2"	27	41.1983166666667	"I just wen with my gut. The timing barely affected my decision."
21	"5701444"	"1-9-10-5-14-15-4-6-3-8-7-11-12-13-16-2"	"4"	"1"	36	32.13475	"I tried to look at which one was active first how long it took for the next one. "
22	"6367748"	"1-10-7-4-14-3-16-5-9-13-6-2-12-11-15-8"	"7"	"1"	58	34.80205	"NOT SO MUCH AS BY THE SEQUENCE"
23	"8550969"	"1-2-6-4-10-7-15-3-9-5-14-12-8-11-16-13"	"0"	"1"	27	58.3193833333333	"Evenly between possible structures, the timing did not influence my decision."
24	"746608"	"1-8-16-9-7-11-14-6-3-10-12-5-4-15-13-2"	"5"	"2"	27	13.7045166666667	"I generally made my best guess at what it actually was and put that as 100%. I like being either right or wron. Timing influence this decesion a little."
25	"8826832"	"1-8-10-7-13-11-4-9-3-15-14-5-12-6-2-16"	"0"	"2"	32	16.1057333333333	"I broke it down into fourths"
26	"5088533"	"1-12-11-14-3-5-16-4-10-7-15-8-2-13-9-6"	"7"	"1"	25	24.5902333333333	"I did it in quarters, so for each one that was chosen, I did it in fourths. I did it based off what each playback said"
27	"8920241"	"1-13-15-16-10-4-2-11-9-7-6-8-5-14-3-12"	"5"	"2"	31	18.6646333333333	"When it seemed like one conclusion was more likely, or had more support via the outcomes"
28	"2797246"	"1-12-15-11-2-5-13-6-4-7-10-8-14-3-16-9"	"7"	"1"	39	26.5314666666667	"If I thought it was 100% right then I gave it to one answer, slowing the time made it better."
29	"1526382"	"1-3-8-11-13-6-12-10-15-7-9-4-14-5-2-16"	"0"	"1"	38	21.8494833333333	"It was hard. just a guess."
30	"5579842"	"1-9-11-6-5-15-8-16-4-13-3-10-12-7-14-2"	"4"	"1"	24	14.5828	"I tried to go with what I thought would be the simplest explanation for the device function in all cases. I may have not been successful though."
31	"2939420"	"1-15-10-7-12-4-11-3-8-14-9-6-13-2-16-5"	"3"	"2"	30	13.2665	"I determined which ones were possible depending on the order that they circles greyed out"
32	"1326558"	"1-14-13-7-9-2-16-11-6-8-10-12-15-5-3-4"	"2"	"2"	26	13.2331833333333	"The timing and order of the events influenced the way that I distributed my points."
33	"2965140"	"1-5-12-8-6-14-9-4-2-11-15-3-10-7-16-13"	"6"	"2"	24	22.31485	"I originally structured it by sequence. After deciding it was 100/4 I started to use how many 4ths the sequence used to get my percentage. Example: if A>E>B showed up 3/4 of the time and A>B>E 1/4 of the time I would have 75% and 25% respectively. "
34	"6574306"	"1-5-7-3-12-10-4-6-13-9-14-2-11-15-8-16"	"5"	"2"	27	23.99765	"i decided only by the order of the letter activations and what was possible, as well as how likely i thought the outcomes would be over four turns"
35	"2183507"	"1-16-5-6-3-10-13-8-2-9-14-12-11-7-15-4"	"7"	"2"	32	18.62095	"I chose from the starting point and then factored in what happened 2nd. I didnt factor time in as heavily as the order."
36	"8529702"	"1-15-12-14-10-6-13-9-5-7-4-8-3-11-16-2"	"7"	"2"	40	21.2792666666667	"I tired to go over scenarios in my head and pick teh most likely based on the models and timing."
37	"3886127"	"1-11-6-13-8-2-3-10-15-7-9-14-12-16-4-5"	"1"	"2"	23	17.8599333333333	"The timing of which the letters lit up influenced me. Sometimes I'd have to completely change my answers if the timing changed. The pattern/order in which they lit up influenced me a lot as well."
38	"9891180"	"1-16-4-8-9-5-7-10-3-12-6-14-15-11-13-2"	"0"	"2"	40	22.0385333333333	"I noticed the sequence and how long it took for each circle to turn grey."
39	"7075864"	"1-4-10-14-8-3-13-6-11-7-2-15-16-5-12-9"	"7"	"1"	37	25.26985	"I chose based on what diagram seemed to represent best how the device worked in the clips. I tried to follow how the grey buttons were set off first. "
40	"9488987"	"1-4-8-2-10-9-11-12-13-7-3-15-14-16-5-6"	"4"	"2"	25	24.51145	"I just kind of guessed for what I thought was the most likely after watching the videos. "
41	"3237802"	"1-12-4-14-2-5-9-8-7-11-6-10-15-13-16-3"	"4"	"1"	45	29.7728833333333	"If the timing of a structure was noticeable to me, I gave a slightly higher percentage to its point.  Such as giving 20 instead of 10 when 3 other structures were of the same sequence.  So, it would be a 80/20 point spread instead of say 90/10."
42	"3833838"	"1-14-7-9-12-4-2-6-16-3-8-10-15-11-13-5"	"6"	"2"	48	17.06795	"by how much the action occured during the 4 clips"
43	"7529425"	"1-14-7-8-11-13-3-5-2-10-15-6-12-9-16-4"	"3"	"2"	25	23.2282666666667	"I ruled out what was impossible, based on the timing, and then distributed percentage points evenly among the rest of the possibilities."
44	"6628556"	"1-11-8-15-9-4-10-7-16-12-14-5-3-2-13-6"	"1"	"2"	26	24.3108333333333	"by how often they came up... the timing helped decided which box to choose"
45	"5939672"	"1-4-3-11-6-12-10-8-15-2-13-14-5-7-16-9"	"3"	"1"	27	26.7813	"I chose to distribute the percentages generally using all that could be it could be it equally, except in cases where it seemed that one might have a percent advantage over another (say when all 4 were the same picture).  My decisions were heavily influenced by the timing of the events as the timing could completely change the answer."
46	"3200797"	"1-7-9-2-13-15-5-10-11-8-12-6-3-14-16-4"	"7"	"2"	31	28.0278666666667	"Well I based the points on how many times each one showed up. So if it showed up 1/4 I tried to reflect that. I learned better how to do this as the trial went on. "
47	"3824718"	"1-6-13-10-5-7-9-4-16-2-11-14-8-12-15-3"	"7"	"2"	34	40.09295	"I looked at all 4 clips and then distributed the percentage points between the scenarios that I thought fit best for those clips. The timing of the events was one factor I took into consideration when making my decisions. I also paid attention to the order of events as well."
48	"2879689"	"1-12-11-16-8-15-9-7-5-6-4-3-14-10-13-2"	"6"	"1"	66	38.0432166666667	"I tried to determine if there was any one I could exclude first. Then tried to determine which letter was most used and how close together in timing. I also did some hopeful guessing. The longer I did it, the simplier it became to understand."
49	"3340189"	"1-14-11-9-7-4-6-15-16-12-10-3-5-8-2-13"	"7"	"2"	64	43.7181	"My strategy changed as the trials progressed. I think I was not thinking as well as I should have been in the first few trials. Later I tried to eliminate the diagrams that wouldn't work via logical thinking. The timing of the events was a big factor in this."
50	"2709170"	"1-2-15-9-3-6-8-11-12-13-14-10-5-7-16-4"	"5"	"1"	37	24.8886666666667	"Yes it was influenced by the timing of the events, but also by how logically I thought it was that each structure would be switched on first.  What were the patterns?  There were only a few set paths and patterns that it could take.  The written explanations were really difficult to understand, but I already understood the instructions intuitively.  I'm good at geometry, logic, and spatial relations.  But really tired and made a bunch of mistakes."
51	"6657055"	"1-11-12-14-7-2-9-10-8-15-6-3-16-5-13-4"	"5"	"2"	27	18.7580166666667	"I chose based on the fact that I wanted to pick the ones that I thought had the greatest possibility of me picking the right one.  I didnt' want to allocate too many points to one thing unless I was absolutely certain."
52	"3345859"	"1-16-6-9-14-7-5-3-13-10-12-4-2-11-15-8"	"7"	"1"	46	59.9880166666667	"I tried to distribute the percentages in order of the videos given. I  was influenced by the timing greatly. If A was first I chose ones with a direct arrow to A as a higher percentage.  If and B were at the same time I would chose diagram with arrows directly to both first."
53	"392603"	"1-11-6-14-4-9-7-5-16-13-10-12-8-2-15-3"	"0"	"2"	24	20.4549	"I distibuted the points based on when the nodes turned on."
54	"2369220"	"1-12-9-3-15-6-5-4-2-10-11-13-8-14-7-16"	"2"	"2"	26	44.4846333333333	"The way they turned gray influenced my decisions for the percentage points."
55	"6320582"	"1-3-9-7-6-15-8-4-11-10-2-12-14-13-5-16"	"4"	"2"	44	42.9526	"Very interesting and fun ... I just used the summary data to determine what I felt was most likely happening ... there were usually at least 2 possibilities, sometimes more. Just went with my gut feeling."
56	"5368430"	"1-14-2-11-10-12-9-13-8-15-6-5-3-7-16-4"	"6"	"1"	26	23.1337333333333	"I chose based on what the movies showed. If gave more percentage points based on the patterns I saw. It wasn't more on timing but rather order."
57	"6947141"	"1-16-5-11-7-9-12-4-6-8-15-10-14-13-3-2"	"2"	"2"	58	31.0264166666667	"if there were specific timing of the events exact with four sequence I would assign 25 or 50 % depending if the other three timings had 2 or 3 possibilitiesif there were 2 or 3 possibilities of how events could happen I would divide that portion by two or three to decide the percentage - in some case all four sequences were the same so if there was an exact match of the sequence I would give 100%I would also say probably my first few cases were not as good at the end when I got into a rhyme, being a computer person I also find a system to guide me how I perform"
58	"1410361"	"1-4-13-14-11-2-10-7-8-5-15-9-12-6-16-3"	"3"	"2"	23	21.4420333333333	"I chose to distribute the percentage points mianly in an 80/20 fashion and it was influenced by the timing of the events but it was still difficult to figure out which diagram it would be. "
59	"4014463"	"1-7-5-3-8-10-16-11-9-12-4-2-6-13-15-14"	"6"	"1"	53	35.4596166666667	"By the timing of the events.  The closer A and B were together the more connected they were."
60	"2202407"	"1-12-3-11-15-9-4-14-7-10-8-5-6-13-2-16"	"6"	"2"	29	15.5192	"I thought about what the order was the node turned on (gray).  I didn't worry too much about what it 'could' be, since there was still a fourth sequence to see."
61	"3675528"	"1-9-4-11-13-16-3-6-7-2-12-5-10-14-8-15"	"7"	"2"	33	21.8186166666667	"I distributed the points as evenly as possible between devices. Timing of the events had no influence."
