|
|
|
|
| Research bulletin: understanding the crime fall |
|
MSc Open Evening - 14 Scholarships |
|
|
|
|
MASTER CLASSES FOR ALL |
|
Problem solving, analysis and implementing responses Autumn 2013 - date TBC |
ANALYST COURSES |
|
Advanced Hotspot Analysis 3 July 2013 |
|
Strategic Assessments 4 July 2013 |
|
COURSE IS FULL! 8-19 July 2013 |
|
Crime Analysis 23-26 September 2013 |
|
Understanding Hotspots 8 October 2013 |
|
Neighbourhood Analysis 5 November 2013 |
|
Predictive Mapping Autumn 2013 - date TBC |
|
Hypothesis Testing Analysis Autumn 2013 - date TBC |
|
Causal Reasoning with Causal Models
| Date: | Wednesday, October 06, 2004 | |
| Time: | 2:00-3:00 pm |
| Location: | Room 102, Dept of Statistical Science, UCL | |
| Contact Name: | Philip Dawid | |
| Contact Phone: | 020 7679 1861 |
The causal interpretation of Bayesian networks has been, and
remains, controversial. I shall here present such an interpretation. I
present a criterion of type causality which depends upon an
indeterministic understanding of Bayesian networks as opposed to the
deterministic views of Pearl and Hausman. Nancy Cartwright has
influentially denounced "Bayes net methods" on the grounds that they
fail under unfaithfulness, which has led to a variety of demonstrations
of how widespread unfaithfulness is. I shall argue that this is a
red-herring, ignoring the nature of causal reasoning with causal models.
Jon Williamson has suggested that the failure of the Common Cause
Principle makes causal discovery a doubtful enterprise; I argue rather
that it is a problematic enterprise, which requires the invention and
development of reliable model-building rules. I offer some plausible
model-building rules, which appear to offer promise for using Bayesian
networks to develop a unified account of type and token causality.
Speaker
| Name: | Kevin Korb | |
| Affiliation: | Monash University | |
| Homepage: | http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~korb/ | |
| Biography |
My research is in artificial
intelligence and the philosophy of science and the interrelation between
the two. Of particular interest to me is the nature of cognition and
learning. From the philosophy side this manifests itself in the study of
confirmation theory and, in particular, Bayesian methods of learning
and theory evaluation. The artificial intelligence side includes all
varieties of machine learning projects, and particularly their analysis
in Bayesian terms. I am also co-founder of Psyche: An Interdisciplinary
Journal of Research on Consciousness.
Page last modified on 23 may 11 09:14






