- UCL Laws PhD Student Awarded Modern Law Review Scholarship for Project on Human Trafficking
- UCL Graduate Law Society Submission to Home Affairs Committee Inquiry on FGM
- Watch Session Videos from the Workshop on Martha Nussbaum's Political Emotions
- Watch President Dean Spielmann's Lecture 'Wither the margin of appreciation?'
- Illegality, Human Rights and Employment
- Dr Virginia Mantouvalou gives evidence to the Joint Committee on the Draft Modern Slavery Bill
- President Dean Spielmann appointed Honorary Professor in the Faculty of Laws
UCL Graduate Law Society Submission to Home Affairs Committee Inquiry on FGM
9 July 2014
This year the UCL Graduate Law Society launched
a project to give students an opportunity to make submissions to
parliamentary inquiries under guidance from Faculty Advisor Colm
O'Cinneide. In particular, the project seeks to contribute a unique
perspective to UK law reform debates from a
comparative point of view, exploiting the diversity of nationalities in
the LLM cohort.
Late last year the Home Affairs Committee initiated
an inquiry into FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) to address the perceived deficiencies in current
protection mechanisms for women and girls at risk of FGM in the UK. The
committee identified specifically that in 28 years of having specialised FGM
criminal law there had not been one successful prosecution under the laws.
The UCL Graduate Law Society submission to the inquiry recognised France as a country which has had more success in prosecuting FGM-related crimes, achieved primarily through mandatory medical checks, but cautioned against emulating French mandatory checks, identifying human rights-based concerns of such an approach [paras 4.6-4.7]. The Home Affairs Committee in their report similarly made the comparison to French law and practice, in reliance to some degree on our French-language research [footnotes 49, 51, 53 and 165]. While it ultimately considered the French prosecution success a 'good example', the report reflected our call for caution in respect of mandatory checks, describing the introduction of a universal system of examinations in the UK as 'a disproportionate response' [para 37]. The Committee otherwise emphasised the need for greater education and effort across all of the public sector in identifying and protecting those most at risk.
Page last modified on 09 jul 14 12:16