Film Studies Events
- Talk - No Room for Fear: Mapping the Hollywood Transition, 1947-1962
- Professor Devin Orgeron and Professor Marsha Orgeron (North Carolina State University)
- Uncompassed, or the Rarity of Theory
- Inventing the Myth of Hollywood
To speed up the application process, please enclose/ upload with your application a sample of your academic writing of a minimum of 4 pages.
10 graduate studentships worth £5000 each
Applications are open to students pursuing, or intending to pursue, a research degree in the Faculty of Arts and Humanities.
Uncompassed, or the Rarity of Theory
Publication date: Jan 17, 2012 11:14:56 AM
Jan 17, 2012 4:00:00 PM
End: Jan 17, 2012 6:00:00 PM
Location: Gustave Tuck Lecture Theatre, UCL Wilkins Building
Film Studies Research Seminar
Research seminar talk by Professor D.N. Rodowick (Harvard University)
Tuesday 17 January, 4-6pm
Gustave Tuck Lecture Theatre, UCL Wilkins Building
The idea of theory in art or film has a long and complex
Indeed the range of activities covered by concepts of theory comprises
a genealogy much longer and more complex than the virtual life of film. As a
form of explanation, theory is ever more important to our comprehension of
contemporary moving image culture, which is ever more powerfully a digital
Yet in film and media studies, as in the humanities in general, attitudes toward theory remain vexed. The decades since the 1970s have witnessed many critiques of theory, mostly unkind.
These attempts to dislodge, displace, overturn, or
otherwise ignore it have taken many forms--against theory, post-theory, after
theory--as if to contain or reduce the wild fecundity of its conceptual
activity or to condemn it to exile. In most cases, these critics have a no more
clear view of what theory is than the thinkers who are supposed to practice it.
The lack of clarity in our picture of theory haunts the humanities, and this is equally true for its defenders as its assailants.
In this paper I ask: What is theory that is should arouse such emotion and debate within the humanities in general and media studies in particular? My response is to argue that a genealogical reflection on theory in general, and in the philosophy of art and media studies in particular, may help to restore some conceptual precision to its range of connotations and semantic values. Genealogy recognizes that theory has no stable or invariable sense in the present, nor can its meanings for us now be anchored in a unique origin in the near or distant past.
If the currency of theory is to be revalued conceptually for the present, we need a history that attends critically to the competing sites and contexts of its provenance in the past, and which can evaluate the forces that shape its diverse and often contradictory conditions of emergence and its distributions as genres of discourse.
Beginning with the metatheoretical
attitude recapitulated in cinema studies’ current interest both in excavating
its own history and in reflexively examining what film theory is or has been, I
will examine the emergence of film aesthetics in the twentieth century from the
perspective of three more or less discontinuous and open genres--expressive,
structural, and cultural.
What can be learned from the variety and contentiousness of writing on film, especially in the silent and early sound periods, is that theory itself functions as a medium; it is less a form of unifying and systematizing a body of knowledge about an object than a mode of activity or of conceptual engagement, a manner of interrogating one’s self and debating with others about the nature of what counts as a (new) medium and how to describe its subjective effects and cultural significance.
For further information contact Dr Lee Grieveson