Welcome to the UCL European Institute, UCL's hub for research, collaboration and information on Europe and the European Union. We are part of the Institute of Advanced Studies.
So the British people have voted with a margin of around 4%, a little
more than 1 million votes, to leave the European Union (EU). Where this
will lead lies somewhere between two absolutely contrasting scenarios.
29 June 2016
Paul Ekins More...
Starts: Jun 29, 2016 12:00:00 AM
A first round of reactions from UCL staff to the EU referendum results.
24 June 2016 More...
Starts: Jun 27, 2016 12:00:00 AM
Both Leave and Remain have appealed to voters’ guts
to the extent that reason itself has become suspicious. Emotions will
rule the day on 23 June, but at what cost?
23 June 2016
Starts: Jun 23, 2016 12:00:00 AM
EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights
Publication date: Nov 03, 2011 10:29 AM
Oct 14, 2012 09:00 AM
End: Dec 04, 2012 03:00 PM
4 December 2012
The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights offers enhanced protection for fundamental rights, in particular by creating accountability for the EU before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). It may also result in EU policy being oriented more towards human rights promotion, in light of the positive obligations imposed by the convention. At the same time it raises questions about the relationship between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts, as well as the relationship between the EU, its Member States, and the ECtHR.
The Open Society European Policy Institute, in collaboration with University College London’s European Institute, is pleased to invite you to an event gathering representatives from the Council of Europe, European Union and its Member States, civil society organisations and academic commentators to discuss the legal and political implications of the EU’s accession to the ECHR. The meeting will explore these institutional, procedural and substantive questions:
- What kind of accession agreement is likely to emerge from the resumed negotiations between the EU and the Council of Europe?
- How will the rules regulating the EU’s internal procedures affect the way that the EU and its Member States are represented as co-respondents in cases before the ECtHR?
- Should complaints between the EU and Member States be excluded from the remit of the ECtHR?
- What will the relationship be between the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the ECtHR?
- To what extent, if at all, will the autonomy of the EU legal order and the CJEU be affected?
- Will accession move the EU from a ‘Europe of markets’ to a ‘Europe of rights’?
- How will accession affect the position of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and can tensions be expected between the Convention and the Charter?
A series of short presentations by panellists will be followed by an open Q&A. The meeting will be held under the Chatham House Rule to encourage an open and frank debate. We expect a short briefing paper drawing on issues raised by the discussion to follow.
|Dr. Basak Cali||Senior Lecturer in Human Rights, University College London|
|Professor Johan Callewaert||Deputy Grand Chamber Registrar European Court of Human Rights|
|Dr. Hannes Kraemer||Legal Service, European Commission|
Dr. Tobias Lock
||Reader in Human Rights Law, University of Surrey|
||Director of the AIRE Centre (Advice on individual rights in Europe)|
||Legal Adviser, Permanent Representation of Austria to the EU|
A light lunch will be provided.
RSVP | Tarana.firstname.lastname@example.org by Friday 23rd November.
Please note that there is limited availability of places. Participation is by invitation only.
Supported by The Open Society European Policy Institute.
With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union.