Skip to site navigation

An Elaborate Rubber Stamp? The Impact of Parliament on Legislation

April 2011 - September 2014

legislation

Conventional wisdom holds that the British parliament is a relatively non-influential, and perhaps even peripheral, institution with respect to policy. The House of Commons in particular is widely criticised, being described in the media as ‘a legislature on its knees’ or ‘an elaborate rubber-stamp’. It might be expected that such widespread criticism would be based on clear and incontrovertible evidence. But in fact there is remarkably little evidence, and remarkably little study, on parliament’s policy influence. Our research assesses whether this picture is accurate by taking a closer look at the passage of bills through the Commons and the Lords.

The project involves detailed tracking of all amendments to 12 case study bills in the 2005 and 2010 parliaments including identifying ‘policy strands’: amendments at different legislative stages which concentrate on the same issue. This allows us to track influence between party groups and between chambers. This analysis, collectively covering thousands of amendments, enables us to quantify the visible influence of different actors in the process, and connections between them.

This detailed amendment analysis is complemented by interviews with key actors involved in each bill, drawn from both chambers, from government and outside groups. Interviews are used to verify conclusions from the quantitative analysis, and to collect evidence of less visible behind-the-scenes influence and relationships. This includes the power of ‘anticipated reactions’, in terms of government tailoring its policy in order to avoid parliamentary dissent.

The current Nuffield-funded project builds on a smaller pilot project examining the impact of parliament (both Commons and Lords) on legislation. This traced all amendments to the Identity Cards Bill 2005-06 to determine their ultimate success, including picking up subtle forms of influence such as where the government moves amendments in response to backbench and opposition concerns. See paper Bicameral Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills: A Case Study of the Identity Cards Bill.

  • This project is funded by the Nuffield Foundation, and runs from April 2011 to May 2013.
  • It is led by Dr Meg Russell, with Daniel Gover as research assistant.
  • Kristina Wollter and Dr Meghan Benton previously worked as researchers on the project.


We are currently in the process of writing a number of journal papers reporting our results from this project. We also plan to write a book about the legislative process based on our findings.

Conferences
  • 'An Elaborate Rubber Stamp?: Reassessing executive dominance of the Westminster legislative process', by Meg Russell, Daniel Gover & Kristina Wollter. Paper presented to the Political Studies Association annual conference, Cardiff, 25-27 March 2013.
  • 'Measurable Difference: Assessing the Westminster Parliament’s Impact on Government Legislation, 2005-2010', by Meg Russell, Meghan Benton, Daniel Gover & Kristina Wollter. Paper presented to the inaugural general conference of the European Consortium of Political Research's standing group on parliaments, Dublin, 24-27 June 2012.
  • '"A Parliament That Bows and Scrapes"?: The Westminster parliament’s impact on government legislation 2005-2010', by Meg Russell, Meghan Benton, Daniel Gover & Kristina Wollter. Paper presented to the Political Studies Association annual conference, Belfast, 3-5 April 2012.


Please refer to the outputs tab of the Policy Impact of Parliament webpage for articles produced prior to the start of this project.

For this project we have studied 12 case study bills: seven from the 2005-10 parliament, and five from the first session of the 2010-15 parliament.

The bills from 2005-10 are:

  • Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
  • Health Bill 2005-06
  • Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill 2006-07
  • Further Education and Training Bill 2006-07 
  • Employment Bill 2007-08
  • Saving Gateway Accounts Bill 2008-09
  • Energy Bill 2009-10

The bills from 2010-12 are:

  • Identity Documents Bill
  • Savings Accounts and Health in Pregnancy Grant Bill
  • Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill
  • Public Bodies Bill
  • Welfare Reform Bill

Parliament Homepage

NEWS

BLOG

Lords appointments urgently need reforming: but how?

Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:00:37 +0000

The appointment of new peers last week has pushed the size of the Lords to its greatest since it was last reformed in 1999. Meg Russell highlights the issues behind having such a large and ‘unruly’ Upper House and argues the situation has now reached crisis point. Reform to both allow existing peers to depart […]

Read more...

The Lords Leader and Cabinet controversies

Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:30:11 +0000

The Prime Minister has angered peers by appointing Baroness Stowell as Leader of the House of Lords without appointing her to the Cabinet. In a scathing debate last Monday David Cameron was criticised for diminishing the status of the Lords Leader, and thus the chamber itself. Meg Russell and Robert Hazell highlight that the row, and […]

Read more...

Defining the office of Prime Minister

Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:00:36 +0000

The British Prime Minister has extensive and growing powers, yet the role is ill-defined in UK constitutional documents. Graham Allen argues in favour of clarifying the role of the Prime Minister. He also suggests it should become a directly elected office, to ensure that it is properly answerable to the UK public. It is symptomatic of the British […]

Read more...
Meg Russell's new book, The Contemporary House of Lords:
Lords book cover - png file

Projects 

CONSULTANCY

The Constitution Unit

Page last modified on 01 jul 13 17:35

Footer menu