Dr Alan Renwick
Position: Deputy Director of the Constitution Unit
Location: 3.15, 29-30 Tavistock Square
Telephone: 0207 679 4987 (Internal: 24987)
Alan Renwick joined UCL in September 2015. His expertise lies mainly in the areas of electoral systems, referendums, and other modes of engaging the public in decision-making processes, such as citizens’ assemblies. His research is comparative: besides the UK, his recent projects have included all European democracies as well as New Zealand, Japan, and Canada.
Alan works with policy-makers on a range of issues. He became a source of authoritative, impartial evidence during the UK’s electoral system referendum of 2011. He has provided evidence to parliamentary select committees on a range of topics, including electoral reform, reform of the House of Lords, and citizens’ assemblies. He is currently engaged with those interested in understanding how to improve the quality of information available during election and referendum campaigns and how to bring a more deliberative approach to politics. Outside the UK, he has also provided advice and participated in debates in a range of settings, including Egypt, Jordan, Hong Kong, and Jersey.
Before coming to UCL, Alan was based at the Universities of Oxford and Reading. He obtained his doctorate, on processes of institutional design in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland during transition from communism, in 2004. He was a postdoctoral research fellow at New College, Oxford from 2003 until 2008 and a Departmental Lecturer in Comparative Politics in the Department of Politics and International Relations, Oxford, from 2005 to 2006. He was based at the University of Reading, latterly as Reader and Associate Professor of Comparative Politics, between 2008 and 2015.
Alan Renwick’s research focuses on the mechanisms through which citizens can engage in democratic politics and policy-making, particularly elections, referendums, and citizens’ assemblies.
Much of Alan’s current research focuses on the conduct of elections and referendums. He is looking in particular at the quality of the debates that take place during election and referendum campaigns and at mechanisms that can be used to improve this. This work fed directly into the 2018 report of the Independent Commission on Referendums.
Alan is one of the world’s leading experts on processes of electoral reform: he has written two major academic books on the subject and a third book aimed for a general audience. He has also contributed to public debates in the UK and elsewhere. His most recent research focuses in particular on the ‘personalisation’ of European electoral systems.
Alan is a leading voice in debates about the development of more deliberative approaches to democracy, particularly through citizens’ assemblies. He led the project to run a Citizens’ Assembly on Brexit in September 2017, which gave unique insights into what kind of Brexit members of the public preferred once they had had the chance to learn and think in depth about the options. This project was part of the ESRC-funded UK in a Changing Europe initiative. Before that, he was part of the Democracy Matters project, and he has examined in depth the idea of establishing a constitutional convention to consider issues of constitutional and democratic reform in the UK.
Alan Renwick has written or co-written three books:
- Faces on the Ballot: The Personalization of Electoral Systems in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2016), co-authored with Jean-Benoit Pilet.
- A Citizen’s Guide to Electoral Reform (Biteback, 2011).
- The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
He has also written or co-written a number of highly influential reports and briefing papers that have contributed to debates about political reform in the UK:
- Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums (Constitution Unit, 2018)
- The Report of the Citizens’ Assembly on Brexit (Constitution Unit, 2017)
- Blueprint for a UK Constitutional Convention (Constitution Unit, 2017)
- The Process of Brexit (UCL European Institute and Constitution Unit, 2017).
- After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention (Constitution Society, 2014).
- House of Lords Reform: A Briefing Paper (Political Studies Association, 2011).
- The Alternative Vote: A Briefing Paper (Political Studies Association, 2011).
He has published a range of articles in academic journals:
- “What kind of Brexit do voters want? Lessons from the Citizens’ Assembly on Brexit”. Political Quarterly, early view. Co-authored with Sarah Allan, Will Jennings, Rebecca McKee, Meg Russell, and Graham Smith.
- “Pedagogy and Deliberative Democracy: insights from Recent Experiments in the United Kingdom”. Contemporary Politics 24, no. 2, 210–32 (2018). Co-authored with Brenton Prosser, Matthew Flinders, Will Jennings, Alan Renwick, Paolo Spada, Gerry Stoker, and Katie Ghose.
- “Electoral Reform: What Do Political Scientists Know That Practitioners Do Not? Lessons from the UK Referendum of 2011”. Election Law Journal 16, no. 3, 341–8.
- “Citizen Participation and Changing Governance: Cases of Devolution in England”. Policy & Politics 45, no. 2 (April 2017), 251–69. Co-authored with Brenton, Prosser, Arianna Giovannini, Mark Sandford, Matthew Flinders, Will Jennings, Graham Smith, Paolo Spada, Gerry Stoker, and Katie Ghose.
- “A British Constitutional Convention?" Political Insight, Volume 6, Issue 2 (September 2015) 8-11
- “Is the Future of Electoral Reform Local?”, Political Quarterly 85, no. 3 (July–September 2014), 368–72.
- “The Quality of Referendum Debate: The UK’s Electoral System Referendum in the Print Media”, with Michael Lamb, Electoral Studies 32, no. 2 (June 2013), 294–304.
- “The UK’s Electoral Reform Referendum of May 2011”, with Samantha Laycock, Daniel Stevens, and Jack Vowles, Electoral Studies 32, no. 2 (June 2013), 211–14.
- “Im Interesse der Macht: Ungarns neues Wahlsystem”, Osteuropa 62, no. 5 (2012), 3–17.
- “Electoral Reform in Europe since 1945”, West European Politics 34, no. 3 (May 2011), 456–77.
- “The Role of Dissident Values in Institutional Choice: 1989 in Comparative Perspective”, East European Politics and Societies 25, no. 2 (May 2011), 296–317.
- “The Expenses Scandal and the Politics of Electoral Reform”, with Michael Lamb and Berna Numan, Political Quarterly 82, no. 1 (January–March 2011), 32–41.
- “Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons from New Zealand”, Representation 45, no. 4 (November 2009), 357–67.
- “How Likely Is Proportional Representation in the House of Commons? Lessons from International Experience”, Government & Opposition 44, no. 4 (October 2009), 366–84.
- “Partisan Self-Interest and Electoral Reform: The New Italian Electoral Law of 2005”, with Chris Hanretty and David Hine, Electoral Studies 28, no. 3 (September 2009), 437–47.
- “Why Did National Promise a Referendum on Electoral Reform in 1990?”, Political Science 59, no. 1 (June 2007), 7–22.
- “Antipolitical or Just Anticommunist? Varieties of Dissidence in East-Central Europe, and their Implications for the Development of Political Society”, East European Politics and Societies 20, no. 2 (spring 2006), 286–318.
- “Why Hungary and Poland Differed in 1989: The Role of Medium-Term Frames in Explaining the Outcomes of Democratic Transition”, Democratization 13, no. 1 (February 2006), 36–57.
- “Modelling Multiple Goals: Electoral System Preferences in Hungary in 1989”, Europe-Asia Studies 57, no. 7 (November 2005), 995–1019.
Finally, he has published a number of chapters in edited volumes:
- “Electoral System Change”. In Erik S. Herron et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–32.
- “Public Debate”. In Anand Menon (ed.), EU Referendum: One Year On. London: Political Studies Association and UK in a Changing Europe, 2017, pp. 10–11.
- “The Performance of the Electoral System”. In Einar Thorsen, Dan Jackson, Darren Lilleker (eds.), UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters, and the Campaign: Early Reflections from Leading Academics. Bournemouth: Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture, and Community, Bournemouth University, 2017, p. 12.
- “Referendums”. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans, and Michael Lewis-Beck (eds.), Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. London: Sage, 2017, pp. 433–58.
- “Voting Behaviour and Electoral Outcomes”. In Richard Heffernan, Colin Hay, Meg Russell, and Philip Cowley (eds.), Developments in British Politics 10. London: Palgrave, 2016, pp. 39–56.
- “Calming the Storm: Fighting Falsehoods, Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales”. In Daniel Jackson, Einar Thorsen, and Dominic Wring (eds.), EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. London: Political Studies Association, 2016, p. 31. Co-authored with Matthew Flinders and Will Jennings.
- “Don’t trust your poll lead: How public opinion changes during referendum campaigns.” In Philip Cowley and Robert Ford (eds.), Sex, Lies and the Ballot Box. London: Biteback, 2014, pp. 79–84.
- “Introduction to ECPR Classics Edition.” In Stein Rokkan, Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2009, pp. i–xix. First edition published by Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1970.
- “The Role of Non-Elite Forces in the Regime Change.” In András Bozóki (ed.), The Roundtable Talks of 1989: The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2002, pp. 191–210.
- “East Meets West”, with Gábor Tóka. In Roger Jowell et al., British—and European—Social Attitudes: The 15th Report: How Britain Differs. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998, pp. 149–171.
- Blog Posts
Thursday, 20 September 2018
With increasing speculation about a possible second referendum on Brexit, this is the fifth in a series of posts about the practicalities of such a poll. With ‘exit day’ set for 29 March 2019, Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick and Meg Russell ask whether the Article 50 period could be extended to allow a referendum to […]
Thursday, 13 September 2018
In the fourth in a series of posts on the mechanics of a possible second referendum on Brexit, Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick and Meg Russell consider what question should be asked. This would be crucial for any vote to command legitimacy. Various models have been proposed, but some are far more credible than others in the current context. […]
Friday, 07 September 2018
With ‘exit day’ less than six months away, public debate about a second Brexit vote continues. In the third of a series of posts on this topic, Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick and Meg Russell outline the key decision points and processes by which MPs or the government might choose to trigger a second referendum In […]
Thursday, 30 August 2018
With exit day less than seven months away, one of the perceived obstacles to a second Brexit referendum is time. Here, in the second in a series of posts on the mechanics of a second referendum, Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick and Meg Russell discuss the constraints, concluding a new referendum could be held much more quickly than previous polls […]
Thursday, 09 August 2018
Two years on from the Brexit vote, the benefits of a second referendum are being hotly debated. In this post, Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick and Meg Russell identify seven questions that should be considered before parliament decides whether a second Brexit referendum will take place. Last week a Sky poll suggested that 50% of the public would favour a […]
Tuesday, 10 July 2018
This week’s turbulent political events represent the fallout from a referendum where the consequences of a ‘change vote’ were unclear. This is just one of many concerns raised about recent UK referendums. To reflect on such problems and consider possible solutions, the Constitution Unit established the Independent Commission on Referendums. Here Jess Sargeant and Alan […]