Skip to site navigation

Referendum on House of Lords reform "politically inevitable"

25 June 2012

Meg Russell on Lords reform

Dr Russell, from University College London's Constitution Unit, was speaking as the Government prepare to publish controversial legislation to introduce elected peers without plans to proceed to a national vote.

Earlier this year, a parliamentary committee responsible for drawing up the proposals recommended that they should be put to a referendum.

This advice was rejected and ministers will now publish the House of Lords Reform Bill with the first elected peers planned to be introduced in 2015.

The decision may be seen as a concession by the Conservatives to Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, who previously compared the House of Lords to the “Chinese People’s Congress”.

However, for all the short-term political manoeuvring, Dr Russell warned the Coalition that it was unlikely to escape a national vote when the Reform Bill began its passage through Parliament. 

Read the full article

Further information

Join the Debate

Blog

News

Reinterpreting Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan

Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:00:51 +0000

Kensuke Ueda outlines the context for the recent reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which until now outlawed war as a means of settling disputes. He suggests the manner in which the changes were pushed through is worrying for Japanese constitutionalism. On 1 July this year the Japanese Government passed the cabinet decision […]

Read more...

Scotland’s constitutional future – from both sides in the debate

Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:00:03 +0000

Charlie Jeffery discusses how both sides in the debate see Scotland’s constitutional future in different ways. It is striking how insular Scotland’s constitutional debate is. Both sides in the debate see Scotland’s constitutional future in different ways as bound up firmly in relationships with the rest of the UK. The Yes side envisages a form […]

Read more...

The ‘Revolving Door’ of Special Advisers?

Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:24:25 +0000

A recent article in the Telegraph was critical of a ‘revolving door’ of special advisers (spads) from the last Labour government into charities or think tanks. As outlined in the forthcoming book on spads by Ben Yong and Robert Hazell, this blog post wishes to point out that the Telegraph article tells only an incomplete story;[1] […]

Read more...
Mailing List

Connect with us

RSSFlickr

Footer menu