Skip to site navigation

Meg Russell gives evidence on impact of Wright reforms in House of Commons

14 March 2013


Today Dr Meg Russell gave evidence to the HoC Political and Constitutional Reform Committee for their inquiry into the impact of the Wright Reforms.

A Constitution Unit report by Meg Russell and Akash Paun published in 2007, The House Rules? International lessons for enhancing the autonomy of the House of Commons acted as a spark for the subsequent Wright Committee reforms which saw the establishment of a backbench business committee and elections for select committee chairs. The Hoc Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is now investigating the impact of those reforms three years on.

See Meg Russell discuss how to measure the impact of the reforms thus far; what reforms remain to be implemented and why; and where we might go from here, on the Parliament website http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=12851

See inquiry webpage and copies of written evidence here http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/revisiting-rebuilding-the-house-the-impact-of-the-wright-reforms/

Join the Debate

Blog

News

Reinterpreting Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan

Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:00:51 +0000

Kensuke Ueda outlines the context for the recent reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which until now outlawed war as a means of settling disputes. He suggests the manner in which the changes were pushed through is worrying for Japanese constitutionalism. On 1 July this year the Japanese Government passed the cabinet decision […]

Read more...

Scotland’s constitutional future – from both sides in the debate

Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:00:03 +0000

Charlie Jeffery discusses how both sides in the debate see Scotland’s constitutional future in different ways. It is striking how insular Scotland’s constitutional debate is. Both sides in the debate see Scotland’s constitutional future in different ways as bound up firmly in relationships with the rest of the UK. The Yes side envisages a form […]

Read more...

The ‘Revolving Door’ of Special Advisers?

Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:24:25 +0000

A recent article in the Telegraph was critical of a ‘revolving door’ of special advisers (spads) from the last Labour government into charities or think tanks. As outlined in the forthcoming book on spads by Ben Yong and Robert Hazell, this blog post wishes to point out that the Telegraph article tells only an incomplete story;[1] […]

Read more...
Mailing List

Connect with us

RSSFlickr

Footer menu