Centre for Law, Economics and Society (CLES)

EVENTS

6 June 2017, London
Competition Law in China: An Introduction

19 June 2017
Blockchain and the Constitution of a New Financial Order: Legal and Political Challenges

27 July 2017
Call for paper: Artificial Cosmoi and the Law

To view past events, please go to the events pages.

A A A

Contact Us

For general enquiries, please contact:

laws.research [at] ucl.ac.uk
+44 (0)20 3108 8484

For research project enquiries, please contact:

Professor Ioannis Lianos
+44 (0)20 3108 8346
i.lianos [at] ucl.ac.uk

Events

Forthcoming events are listed below. Past events can be viewed here.

Organised by the UCL Centre for Law, Economics and Society

Tuesday 6 June 2017, 09:30 - 17:30

Competition Law in China: An Introduction

A one-day CPD course introducing Chinese Competition Law

taught by
Dr Thomas Cheng (The University of Hong Kong)
Dr David Stallibrass (Fingleton Associates)

About the course:
This six-hour short course will give an introduction to the Chinese Competition Law and will cover all the basic aspects of substantive competition law in China, including:

  • restrictive agreements,
  • abuse of dominance,
  • merger review,
  • IP-competition interface, and
  • an area of competition law unique to China known as abuse of administrative monopoly.

The course will introduce the leading cases with reference to both private litigation in the courts and administrative enforcement by state agencies.

It will highlight the similarities and difference between the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law and competition law in other jurisdictions, such as the EU and the US. In addition, it will set the Chinese law within the broader context of Chinese political and economic development.

The course will include a discussion of the unique context in which competition law is enforced in China and a critical evaluation of the cause and effect of divergence between Chinese and international competition law norms.

Course schedule:

09:30 Registration
10:00 Session 1: General Introduction + Restrictive Agreements
11:30 Break
11:45 Session 2: Abuse of Dominance
13:15 Lunch (lunch is provided)
14:15 Session 3: Merger Review
15:45 Break
16:00 Session 4: IP-Competition Interface/Abuse of Administrative Monopoly
17:30 Course ends

What you will learn: 

  • You will become familiar with the political economy and institutional environment that contextualises competition law enforcement in China.
  • You will understand the basic aspects of all areas of substantive competition law, including restrictive agreements, abuse of dominance, merger review, IP-competition interface, and an area of competition law unique to China known as abuse of administrative monopoly.
  • You will  be introduced to leading cases with reference to both private litigation in the courts and administrative enforcement by state agencies.
  • You will acquire a greater appreciation of the development of competition law in China in the context of the global debate about and movement toward convergence.

Course Prerequisites: 
There are no prerequisites for this course, though a good understanding of UK, EU, or US competition law is highly desirable.

Readings:
A pack with english translations of core legislation, guidance, and decisions will be provided.

About the teachers
Thomas Cheng is an associate professor at the Faculty of Law of the University of Hong Kong. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale College, and a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School, and a Bachelor of Civil Law degree in European and Comparative Law from the University of Oxford. His research focuses on competition law and policy issues, especially comparative competition law and competition law in developing countries. He is a member of the Hong Kong Competition Commission, Administrative Appeals Board, the Energy Advisory Committee, and the Committee on Slots Complaints. He has assisted the Hong Kong government in drafting the city’s first comprehensive competition law. He is also a member of the executive board of the Academic Society for Competition Law (“ASCOLA”) and is a member of the advisory board of the American Antitrust Institute.

David Stallibrass is a director at Fingleton Associates, a strategic regulatory advice boutique. He was the first economist to testify before both a regional high-court and the Supreme Peoples Court of China in an antitrust dispute in the high profile dispute between Tencent and Qihoo 360. Previously he worked in a number of roles at the UK Office of Fair Trading such as Director responsible for consumer protection and competition enforcement in the health and professional services industries; Assistant Director responsible for the OFT’s investigation into bank charges; Senior Economic Advisor on a wide range of investigations and mergers; and Head of Strategy. David has degrees from Oxford Univeristy and the London School of Economics, is a senior research fellow at Koguan Law School in Shanghai, and has published a number of articles on antitrust and regulation. Currently David is a director at Fingleton Associates, a strategic regulatory advice boutique.

Visit the event page to register.

Organised by the UCL Centre for Law, Economics and Society with the support of the Modern Law Review and UCL Public Engagement

Monday 19 June 2017, 09:30 - 18:00, followed by a reception

Blockchain and the Constitution of a New Financial Order: Legal and Political Challenges

The workshop deals with emergent economic, political and legal phenomena in the field of FinTech. It pursues two distinct goals. First, it intends to generate awareness and facilitate a better understanding of the actors, phenomena and dynamics of the new financial order. Second, it explores the political and legal implications of financial and technological innovation based on blockchain technology. These debates will constitute the basis of an edited volume that introduces practitioners and researchers to the regulatory and political challenges of blockchain technologies and its diverse uses.

The Speakers include:

  • Tomaso Aste (UCL)
  • Iris Chiu (UCL)
  • Georgios Dimitropoulos (Hamad Bin Khalifa University Law School)
  • Stefan Eich (Princeton Society of Fellows)
  • Hermann Elendner (Humboldt University of Berlin)
  • Jonathan Greenacre (Oxford University)
  • Rohan Grey (Modern Money Network)
  • Philipp Hacker (EUI)
  • Michael Jacobides (London Business School and NY Fed)
  • Rosa María Lastra (Queen Mary University of London)
  • Ioannis Lianos (UCL)
  • Pietro Ortolani (Max Planck Institute Luxembourg)
  • Giovanni Sartor (European University Institute)
  • Alexandros Seretakis (University of Luxembourg)
  • Paolo Tasca (UCL)
  • Angela Walch (St. Mary’s University School of Law)
  • Aaron J. Wright (Cardozo School of Law)
  • Karen Yeung (King’s College London)
  • Claus D. Zimmermann (Sidley Austin LLP)

Learning Outcomes:
This event will introduce legal practitioners and researchers to the regulatory and political challenges of blockchain technologies and its diverse uses.

Visit the event page to register and for further information.

Thursday 27 July 2017, Athens

Call for paper: Artificial Cosmoi and the Law: Legal Theory and practice in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning, and robots

A conference supported by the Centre for Law, Economics & Society at UCL, IMEDIPA and the EPLO

Call for papers deadline: 30 May 2017

The conference organizers of the ‘Artificial Cosmoi and the Law’ seek contributions in the form of scholarly papers in order to foster a lively debate between scholars from various disciplines and practitioners on the interaction between Artificial Intelligence, machine learning, robots, virtual reality and algorithmic decision-making – the ‘artificial cosmoi’, and the legal system.

The recently published ‘One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence’ identifies a number of areas of human activity that are and will likely be affected by AI in the near future.[1] But the law is conspicuously slow in adapting to the needs of society and in particular to the development of new technologies. Law usually reacts to societal changes, but it, moreover, usually has a restricting function: it prohibits rather than enables certain types of activities. Both features of law make it a rather poor instrument to deal with the cataclysmic changes that the rapid developments in the technologies of Artificial Intelligence will be bringing about in the not too distant future. These will touch upon all aspects of social life, from issues of employment and intellectual creation, or more generally the creation of resources, to new modes of data and AI-driven governance, and will affect multiple environments reaching from the streets and hospitals to the battlefield. If it is for the law to remain relevant, it will have to rapidly adapt to these challenges so as not to move from the epicenter to the periphery of social activity. A possible, mostly reactive, approach will be to design legal rules mitigating the risks arising from the recourse to Artificial Intelligence and the development of artificial cosmoi, but also to take advantage of algorithms and AI in achieving the objectives of the law. The Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament recently proposed the establishment of a European Agency for robotics and artificial intelligence in order to supply public authorities with technical, ethical and regulatory expertise, and the setting of common European Union rules to be adopted on a voluntary basis to regulate issues of liability for the social, environmental and human health impacts of robotics in order to ensure that they operate in accordance with legal, safety and ethical standards – eventually by also considering the creation of a specific legal status for robots as ‘electronic persons’;[2] this illustrates the increasing interest of legislators and regulators in the various societal, legal and ethical risks raised by AI and associated technologies. However, beyond this reactive approach, how should legal epistemology be re-conceived so as to fully engage with the ‘structuration’ of the emerging ‘artificial cosmoi’?

Suggested topics that are of interest for the call for papers are:

  • Interdisciplinary perspectives on artificial intelligence and the law: towards Law, Science and Technology studies 2.0?
  • Legal personality and intellectual creation in the Era of AI: From Matrix, Terminator 2 and Hal 9000 to Ghost in the Shell and Sunspring
  • Comparative approaches to the regulation of new technologies, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, machine learning, robotics and algorithmic decision-making
  • Artificial cosmoi, institutional change and demo-cratic politics
  • Human rights in the era of AI
  • The protection of intellectual creation in the era of AI
  • The regulation of employment and labour law in the Era of robotics
  • Privacy and data protection challenges in the Internet of Things
  • Machine ethics and ethical rules for robots
  • Algorithmic decision-making, public policy, and the law
  • Blockchain technology, public policy, and the law
  • Artificial cosmoi and the professions (regulation, ethics)
  • The use of AI, machine learning and robots in judicial and arbitral decision-making contexts
  • The rise of RegTech and future challenges for AI-supported regulation
  • Artificial cosmoi and tortious/criminal liability
  • Automated self-driving vehicles – drones, cars, and beyond: implications for the legal system
  • Autonomous weapons in law enforcement, or the military: implications for the legal system

The conference will include contributions by:

  • Sylvie Delacroix, UCL Law and UCL Computer Science
  • George Dimitropoulos, HBKU Law
  • Clinton W. Francis, HBKU Law & Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
  • David Singh Grewal, Yale Law School
  • Ioannis Lianos, UCL
  • Nicholas Petit, University of Liege

[1] Peter Stone et al..  ‘Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030’. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,  September 2016, available at: http://ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report.

[2] Study available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-582.443%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0//EN

Visit the event pager for further information.

Page last modified on 19 may 17 11:49