- January Intake Approved for Graduate Programme in Health & Medical Sciences (HMS)
- BMJ Editorial: Caldicott 2 and Patient Data
- "Patient Safety, Law Policy and Practice" Published in Paperback
- UCL Joins the European Connected Health Alliance
- UCL CHIME is Early Contributor to New Health Informatics Online Resource
- Professor Dipak Kalra takes up Presidency of the EuroRec Institute
- 2012 European Summit on Trustworthy Reuse of Health Data – plenary sessions now available on YouTube
- "Patient Safety, Law Policy and Practice"
- Ethnicity and academic performance in medicine
- Uptake of flu vaccine among healthcare workers
- Open Source, Open Standards, and Health Care Information Systems
- howRU, a new short generic measure of health status
- Dr Don E. Detmer honoured by American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA)
- Public 'reassured' by swine flu media coverage
- Key NHS IT Programmes – UCL report
- UKHIT online - Computers and the Internet
- Group membership and staff turnover affect outcomes in group CBT for persistent pain
- Electronic patient records are not a panacea
- Using computerised CBT to prevent mental health problems: a systematic review and a case study of Xanthis
- New Students Begin UCL Postgraduate Programme in Health Informatics
- CHIME researcher contributes to new book
Group membership and staff turnover affect outcomes in group CBT for persistent pain
8 February 2010
In a new paper in the journal Pain (published online, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.011), Amanda Williams (UCL Research Department for Clinical, Education and Health Psychology) and Henry Potts (CHIME) describe how contextual factors can affect patient outcome in the setting of a specialist treatment centre for persistent pain.
The study used retrospective data over a 12-year period on patients who had group cognitive-behavioural therapy, an established approach in persistent pain. Analysis demonstrated clinically significant group effects: that is, an individual's outcome could be pulled up or down by the group they were in. The study also showed that periods of higher staff turnover led to worse patient outcomes.
Few studies look at these sorts of contextual
effects. Such effects may not be seen in prospective studies or trials,
as these are often brief, with staff generally employed for the
duration of the trial and adhering to a detailed protocol for
treatment. Others have looked at the therapist/patient relationship in a
one-to-one setting, but there is little known about group settings or
how turnover in a multidisciplinary clinical team impacts in patients.
This was an exploratory study producing suggestive rather than definitive results, but there may be broad implications. Turnover and morale issues are widely relevant, for managers as well as for clinicians, since change is a constant in health systems, but the possible costs in decrements to patient outcomes are rarely considered.
Contact: Henry Potts