TULYS/1

Corpus Refs:Henderson/Okasha/1992:1
Macalister/1949:908
Okasha/Forsyth/2001:Tullylease 1
Site:TULYS
Discovery:first mentioned, 1851 Windele, J.
History:Henderson/Okasha/1992, 1--2: `still at Tullylease, within the ruins of the old church. ... Clamped onto the east wall of the church. ... Recorded in 1851 by Windele'.
Geology:
Dimensions:0.95 x 0.63 x 0.07 (Henderson/Okasha/1992)
Setting:in struct
Location:on site
Form:cross-slab
Henderson/Okasha/1992, 1: `an inscribed cross-slan, orginally rectangular'.
Condition:complete , some
Henderson/Okasha/1992, 1: `with two corners now damaged'.
Folklore:none
Crosses:1: latin; interlace; straight; other; circular; angular; inner curv; other; decorated
Decorations:

Henderson/Okasha/1992, 1--2: `Incised with a framed shafted Greek cross having U-shaped expansions and ornamented partly in relief but mainly in incision with fret-interlace, and spiral patterns'.

References


Inscriptions


TULYS/1/1

Readings

Macalister, R.A.S. (1949):[...] || XP~S
Expansion:
[IHS] XPS
Expansion:
[IESUS] CHRISTUS
Henderson/Okasha/1992 8 reading only
Macalister/1949 92 reading only

Notes

Orientation:horizontal
Position:n/a ; broad ; within quadrants ; quadrant
Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 120: `incised horizontally in the top right corner'.
Incision:inc
Date:733 - 766 (Henderson/Okasha/1992)
Henderson/Okasha/1992, 34: `middle years of the eigth century'.
733 - 766 (Okasha/Forsyth/2001)
Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 121: `middle of the eighth century'.
Language:Latin (rbook)
Ling. Notes:none
Palaeography:Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 120: `The texts are both in half-uncial script and are both legible'.

CISP: The lettering is in half-uncial. The S is angular like elsewhere at Tullylease and the X is formed of two curved strokes.

Legibility:good
Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 120: `legible'.
Lines:1
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References


TULYS/1/2

Readings

Macalister, R.A.S. (1949):QUICUMQUA/E || HUNC TITULU~ | LEGERIT || ORAT PRO | BERECHTUINE
Expansion:
QUICUMQUAE HUNC TITULUM LEGERIT ORAT PRO BERECHTUINE
Macalister/1949 92--93 reading only
Okasha, E. (1992):QUICU[M]QUA/E || HUNC T/IT/UL/U~ | L/EG/ERIT || ORAT PRO | BERECHTUINE
Expansion:
QUICUMQUAE HUNC TITULUM LEGERIT ORAT PRO BERECHTUINE
Translation:
Whoever will have read this inscription, let her/him pray for Berechtuine (PN).
Henderson/Okasha/1992 8 reading only

Notes

Orientation:horizontal
Position:n/a ; broad ; within quadrants ; separated
Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 120: `set in three horizontal lines, the first two interrupted by the shaft of the cross, the third only in the left quadrant'.
Incision:inc
Date:733 - 766 (Henderson/Okasha/1992)
Henderson/Okasha/1992, 34: `middle years of the eigth century'.
600 - 699 (Macalister/1949)
Macalister/1949, 92: `The person mentioned is presumably the seventh-century Saxon saint Berechert, to whom the church and other ecclesiastical remains are dedicated'.
733 - 766 (Okasha/Forsyth/2001)
Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 121: `middle of the eighth century'.
Language:Latin (rbook)
Ling. Notes:Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 121: `Orat is probably an error for oret `may he/she pray', as occurs elsehwere in Hiberno-Latin, or possibly for the imperative orate `pray'. Legerit could be an error for legit `reads' but as it stands could be either future perfect `will have read' or, perhaps, perfect subjunctive `might have read'. The titulum may refer to the whole inscription or, more specifically, on to text a [TULYS/1/1]'.
Palaeography:Henderson/Okasha/1992, 13-14: `the script used...can be described as Insular majuscule...the script used is likely to date from before the emergence in the early tenth century of square minuscule as the Insular hand'.

Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 120: `The texts are both in half-uncial script and are both legible'.

CISP: The lettering is Insular half-uncial. The A's are in the 'OC' form and numerous letters such as H, U, T, L and B have wedge-shaped finials. TI and TU in the first line are conjoined such as also found on TULYS/4 and GE and LE are also conjoined in line two. In line one A/E are ligatured. According to the published drawing in Okasha/Forsyth/2001, 119, three of the Rs are of the typical open-bowed majuscule variety, but one has a closed bow and an almost horizontal 'foot'. These differences appear less marked on their published photograph. The final word of the inscription - BERECHTUINE - appears to have been carved with the letters decreasing in size; an interesting example of epigraphic diminuendo?

Legibility:good
Henderson/Okasha/1992, 8: `some letters...are rather worn'.
Lines:3
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References