|Discovery:||first mentioned, 1916 Lyons|
|Dimensions:||1.26 x 0.43 x 0.33 (converted from Macalister/1945)|
Macalister/1945, 8, suggests that a fracture across the stone's top, cutting off the inscription, was the result of deliberate action, `presumably by the masons who built the wall around the well'.
|Condition:||frgmntry , good|
|Decorations:||no other decoration|
|Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):||ALATTOSMAQIBR[--|
ALATTOS MAQI BR[--
Macalister/1945 7--8 concise discussion
Ziegler/1994 252 reading only
|Position:||inc ; arris ; n/a ; inc|
|Date:||400 - 500 (Ziegler/1994)|
|Ling. Notes:||See McManus/1991, 94, 126.|
Macalister/1945, 8, suggests that the inscription was damaged by masons, resulting in the loss of characters. He suggests a solitary vowel notch survives on the downward side of the stone. This is indicated by an arrow in the accompanying illustration.