LGIAN/1

Corpus Refs:Huebner/1876:142
Macalister/1945:386
Nash-Williams/1950:92
Site:LGIAN
Discovery:first mentioned, 1848 Jones, T.L.D.
History:Jones/Westwood/1848, 105--106, record that at some point before 1848, the stone had been used as a sundial. Jones cleared away the soil around it to reveal the remainder of the base and the rest of the inscription of which he took a rubbing.

RCAHMW/1964, 64, records the stone in the same location.

Geology:RCAHMW/1964, 64: `granite'.
Dimensions:1.02 x 0.33 x 0.3 (converted from Macalister/1945)
Setting:in ground
Location:earliest
Macalister/1945, 364, notes that the stone is to the north of the church but Nash-Williams/1950, 90, states that it lies on the south side of the church. Other sources agree with Nash-Williams. It is likely that Macalister is incorrect.
Form:plain
Jones/Westwood/1848, 105: `erect stone, which probably once supported a sun-dial, judging from the nails still remaining in its head...Upon our removing the earth from the foot of the stone, where it had been allowed to accumulate, I was agreeably surprised to find it neatly paved round, the paving sinking slightly towards the middle'.

Macalister/1945, 364: `The top of the stone has been cut off to make a base for a sundial, but without interfering with the inscription...horizontal section of the stone triangular'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 88--90: `Rough pillar-stone (head cut away flat to make a sundial)... The stone is surrounded by a circle of stone paving (? not original)'.

RCAHMW/1964, 64: `rough pillar of granite...3ft. 4ins. high above ground, the top cut off flat, 15 ins. wide at its broadest, tapering above and below, 12 ins. thick'.

Condition:incomplete , some
Macalister/1945, 364: `The top of the stone has been cut off to make a base for a sundial'.
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:no other decoration

References


Inscriptions


LGIAN/1/1     Pictures

Readings

Jones, T.L.D. (1848):MEL/IMEDICI | FILIMARTINI | IACIT
Expansion:
MELI MEDICI FILI MARTINI IACIT
Jones/Westwood/1848 106 reading only
Westwood/1876 179 reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):MEL/IMEDICI | FILIMARTINI | IACIT
Expansion:
MELI MEDICI FILI MARTINI IACIT
Macalister/1945 88--90 reading only
Nash-Williams, V.E. (1950):MEL/IMEDICI | FILIMARTINI | I[A]CIT
Expansion:
MELI MEDICI FILI MARTINI IACIT
Translation:
(The stone) of Melus (PN) the Doctor, son of Martinus (PN). He lies (here).
Nash-Williams/1950 90 reading only
RCAHMW (1964):MEL/IMEDICI | FILIM/ARTINI | IACIT
Expansion:
MELI MEDICI FILI MARTINI IACIT
RCAHMW/1964 64 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical down
Position:inc ; broad ; n/a ; undecorated
Incision:inc
Jones/Westwood/1848, 106, note that the letters are shallow.
Macalister/1945, 364: `chiselled'.
Date:400 - 499 (Jones/Westwood/1848)
Westwood's dating is based on the palaeography.
400 - 533 (Nash-Williams/1950)

400 - 550 (RCAHMW/1964)

500 - 533 (Jackson/1953)
Language:Latin (rcaps)
Ling. Notes:Jones/Westwood/1848, 107: `The formula of the inscription, the introduction of the word MEDICI, and the omission of the word HIC, are to be noticed'.

Macalister/1945, 366: `The word HIC is absent'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 90: `The mention of the deceased's secular profession is exceptional. Such details, normal in pagan Roman epitaphs, were generally, but not invariably, omitted by the early Christians in conformity with their professed detachment from worldly affairs. This appears to be the only record of a medicus on an Early Christian inscription in Britain. Such mentions are not uncommon in contemporary continental inscriptions'.

Palaeography:Jones/Westwood/1848, 106, (in letter from Jones): `I particularly noticed the similarity of the form of the E to that of the same letter in the Llannor inscriptions...and also in the inscription at Llanfihangel y Traethau. The first two letters in the word are almost obliterated, and the word HIC is omitted'.

Jones/Westwood/1848, 106--107, (in letter from Westwood): `The letters are entirely Roman capitals which is a positive proof of the great age of the stone. There are, in fact, none of the rude minuscule letters, subsequently in use, intermingled with the capitals...The letter [sic] in this Llangian stone are about two inches high. The M is to be noticed as having its first and last strokes slanting like a W turned upside down (M); and in the second M the tops of these two strokes are carried higher than the places of junction of the strokes of the middle V, giving the letter somewhat of the appearence of the rustic-shaped capital M, which is also an indication of very great age in Roman inscriptions, occuring very often in those found at Pompeii. The L and I in the first word are conjoined, the I not being so tall as the L, and extending below the line; this conjunction indicates a debased style, and which I have seen carried so far that the L and I were formed thus [L I ligature drawn] (The i at the end of the words is often carried like a j, below the line, in early Irish and Anglo-Saxon MSS). The F and R are also debased in their forms, especially the latter, in which the first stroke extends slightly below the line, the loop is very large, and the bottom right hand stroke almost horizontal. We have here, therefore, an approach to the debased minuscule R [drawn] as it appears for instance on some of the Llantwit stones...The M and A, too, in the beginning of the word MARTINI are conjoined. With these exceptions the letters are very good Roman capitals, and I should be inclined to consider the inscription as not later than the fifth century'.

Simpson/1863, 130: `For -- as the accompanying woodcut of the Llangian inscription shows -- the F in the word FILI is very much of the same type or form as the F seen by Lhwyd in the Cat-stane, and drawn by him...The context and position of this letter F in the Llangian legend leaves no doubt as to its true character. The form is old and Mr Westwood considers the age of the Llangian inscription as `not later than the fifth century''.

Westwood/1879, 179: `The letters of the inscription are entirely Roman capitals...about 2 inches high'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 90: `Roman capitals. LI in l. 1 is conjoined in the Roman cursive fashion'.

RCAHMW/1964, 64: `the L and I of the first word are conjoined, also the M and A of the fourth'.

Legibility:good
Jones/Westwood/1848, 106: `Owing to the weathering of the surface, and the slight depth of the incisions, there was some difficulty at first in reading the inscription, but by means of rubbings this difficulty was removed'.

Macalister/1945, 364: `in good condition though worn'.

Lines:3
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References