Corpus Refs: | none |
Site: | CSTGR |
Discovery: | first mentioned, 1910 Macalister, R.A.S. |
History: | Brindley and Kilfeather/1993, 12, record that the stone is now lost, but that it was seen by Macalister in 1910. |
Geology: | |
Dimensions: | 3.05 x 0.0 x 0.0 (converted from Macalister/1910) |
Setting: | Lost (present , missing ) |
Location: | unknown Brindley and Kilfeather/1993, 12: `present location unknown'. |
Form: | plain |
Condition: | frgmntry , inc |
Folklore: | none |
Crosses: | 4: equal-armed; linear; inc; inc; inc; none; none; none; plain 1: equal-armed; inc; inc; inc; inc; none; none; none; plain 2: equal-armed; linear; inc; inc; inc; none; inc; inc; inc 3: equal-armed; linear; inc; inc; inc; none; none; none; plain |
Decorations: | Macalister/1910, 350--351: `there are four plain crosses and a double cross about the size of the two plain crosses'. |
Brindley, A. (1993): | [--] Expansion: [--] Brindley/Kilfeather/1993 12 minor reference |
Orientation: | Incomplete Information |
Position: | n/a ; arris ; inc ; undecorated |
Incision: | inc |
Date: | None published |
Language: | Incomplete Information (ogham) |
Ling. Notes: | none |
Palaeography: | none |
Legibility: | inc Brindley and Kilfeather/1993, 12: `The stone was...pitted and scored, the latter being considered as a possible ogham inscription'. |
Lines: | |
Carving errors: | n |
Doubtful: | yes |