|Discovery:||first mentioned, 1869 Prim|
|History:||Macalister/1945, 33, gives the earliest reference for this stone as by one 'Prim' in 1869.|
|Geology:||Macalister/1945, 33: `sandstone'.|
|Dimensions:||1.57 x 0.2 x 0.0 (converted from Macalister/1945)|
Macalister/1945, 33: `Built into the outer face of the E. wall of the ruined church, beneath the E. window, and now partly concealed by a modern tombstone erected against the wall'.
|Condition:||incomplete , some|
Macalister/1945, 33--34: `...the top of the stone is broken off, and the first angle is spalled'.
|Decorations:||no other decoration|
|Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):||TASEGAGNI ||| [MAQ]IMUCOIMACORBO|
TASEGAGNI [MAQ]I MUCOI MACORBO
Macalister/1945 33--34 reading only
|McManus, D. (1991):||--]MUC[--]MAC[--|
McManus/1991 67 minor reference
|Orientation:||vertical up along down|
|Position:||n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undecorated|
Macalister/1945, 33: `chisel-cut'.
|Date:||400 - 550 (Ziegler/1994)|
Macalister/1945, 34: `In the first line the greater part of the letters SEG are now diffcult to see by reason of the intrusive tombstone: in the second line the H-half of the R is flaked away'.
McManus/1991, 67, lists this as one of the readings given by Macalister that he would question: `Macalister's sketch is upside-down. The tombstone in front of the stone made a satisfactory reading impossible'.