BALIG/2

Corpus Refs:Macalister/1897:7
Macalister/1945:149
Site:BALIG
Discovery:recognised, 1782 Pelham, H.
History:According to Macalister/1945, 144, this stone was found `in an ancient burial-ground, callled Kilvickillane, on the shore of Smerwick Bay'. It was subsequently transferred in 1848 to Burnham, the seat of Lord Ventry, where it remains.
Geology:Macalister/1945, 145: `Grit'.
Dimensions:1.27 x 0.38 x 0.2 (converted from Macalister/1945)
Setting:unattch
Location:other
According to Macalister/1945, 145, this stone was found in an ancient burial-ground, callled Kilvickillane, on the shore of Smerwick Bay. It was subsequently transferred in 1848 to Burnham, the seat of Lord Ventry, where it remains.
Form:plain
Condition:complete , some
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:no other decoration

References


Inscriptions


BALIG/2/1     Pictures

Readings

Macalister, R.A.S. (1897):MAQQIQETTIA | MAQQICUNITTI
Expansion:
MAQQI QETTIA MAQQI CUNITTI
Macalister/1897 28 reading only
McManus/1991 65 reading only
Ziegler/1994 264 reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):MAQQIQUETTI ||| MAQQICUNITTI
Expansion:
MAQQI-QETTI MAQQI CUNITTI
Macalister/1945 145--146 reading only
Cuppage, J. (1986):MAQQICUNITTI ||| [M]A[Q]QIQETTI[A]
Expansion:
MAQQICUNITTI [M]A[Q]QI QETTI[A]
Cuppage/etal/1986 251 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical up up
Position:n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undecorated
Incision:inc
Date:None published
Language:Goidelic (ogham)
Ling. Notes:See McManus/1991, 108.
Palaeography:none
Legibility:inc
Macalister/1945, 146: `There is a faint, broad hollow notch after QETTI, at the end of the first line, not nearly as deep as the I-notches preceding it. It might be A, but I am inclined to reject it. In the second line, the N looks at first like an R, because the last scores (hardly the first) bend round the adjacent angle to the right: at this place the two angles approximate so closely that the stone-cutter evidently considered that he had insufficient breadth on the B-surface to hold the consonant scores which would have to be placed there. Beyond the letter in question the two angles coalesce'.

Cuppage/etal/1986, 251: `The M is not now discernible but is recorded by Macalister...The first two scores of the Q have all but disappeared, but most earlier accounts include them. After the final I there is a less distinct notch which may represent A; Macalister included this in 1897 but subsequently rejected it in 1945'.

Lines:1
Carving errors:n
Doubtful:no

Names

References